Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, it is believed that there is too much concentration and facilities put on the conservation of natural birds and animals. Although less focusing on the security of wild animals brings several benefits, it is my view that we should preserve the wildlife.
On the one hand, the lack of ecosystem preservation has its own advantages. Less noticing to the other lifes requires less investment. It can be explained that if we did not care much about the security of wildlife, there would not be as many facilities as currently because we would have not used cutting-edge technologies for complicated purposes. Consequently, the huge amount of money would be spent on the healthcare system, industry or agriculture in order to improve the standard of human life.
On the other hand, there are an enormous number of drawbacks if we give the ecosystem lack of attention. The main problem is that some species will be on the verge of extinction, which leads to various disadvantages. Details, there are some missing at the food chain, which lead to the collapse of the whole ecosystem. For instance, the disappearance of several insects in Vietnam led to the extinction of bats which are the main predators of these insects. Thus, the other animal relying on the existence of bats will be hard to survive, which leads to the decline of species variety.
In conclusion, Despite of several benefits if we reduce our concentration on animal protection, such as more properties used for different aims, This attitude might receive terrible effects such as the collapse of the ecosystem.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-17 | ktoan | 80 | view |
2023-11-17 | ktoan | 56 | view |
2023-08-22 | ngo viet | 78 | view |
2023-08-22 | Stella2003 | 89 | view |
2023-08-22 | Stella2003 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree 56
- You should spend 20 minutes on this task The bar chart shows the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 56
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- You should spend 20 minutes on this task The bar chart shows the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04150943396 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92482287013 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562264150943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6901894174 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899780659136 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313414315224 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412872961534 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594372315569 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542942566833 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.