In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
These days, the peaked development of technology is likely to make agriculture exploitation easier. Even in the midst of this intensity, however, it lies in the fact that more and more people are dealing with hunger. From my perspective, the population explosion in undeveloped countries and biased distribution of products are the two underlying factors that lead to this burning issue.
On the one hand, the population boom can be clearly recognized in poor territories due to the lack of knowledge. Citizens in those area, in fact, are not imparted with enough perception about the effects of this problem, while their political leaders have not carried out enough policy to curb the situation. Therefore, the significant rise of populations leads to the lack of food in each families. Even amidst the development of advances technology, those countries cannot even approach and applied due to the limitation in economy and experts. To tackle this problem, in my opinion, the countries’ authorities are required to manage the circumstance by propagandizing and proposing strict policies. Procreation, for instance, needs to be limited.
On the other hand, the biased distribution of agricultural products seems to be one of the crucial cases. Some countries make up the high proportion of agriculture outcomes, while in the others, accessing to enough provisions is such a difficulty. Specifically, even if the technology advances, most of food supply will be allocated to the landlord and developed countries. Therefore, in many areas such as Africa and some countries in South America, citizens tend to lack of rations. The World Trade Organization as well as governments need to cooperate to manage the import and export of food; consequently, make the shared allocation of food supply.
To put it in a nutshell, to thoroughly solve the issue of hunger, the participation of the authorities to tackle population and distribution problem in the most instrumental.
- Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment Others disagree and think that it encourages violent behaviour Discuss both these view and give your own opinion 93
- Populations 73
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 89
- In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it a valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility What is your opinion 73
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...e to the lack of knowledge. Citizens in those area, in fact, are not imparted with enough ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36538461538 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17666851901 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5964537335 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0631954430994 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199845409039 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0216128224315 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.033801458392 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276690259944 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.