In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Agricultural segment has been of great significance to mankind which has been challenging for some countries worldwide, and is yet to be resolved. Nowadays, more and more people are becoming the starving despite the improvement in facilities. This essay will give rationales behind this issue as well as propose pliable solutions to it.
To begin with, there are several typical reasons why humans tend to be short of staples. One of the foremost justifications for this problem is the effect of weather events such as: earthquake, floods, etc. Clearly, no matter how state-of-the-art the infrastructures are, it is incapable of getting around the climatic conditions. This is because both weather and climates are the natural phenomena which could not be combatted without forecasting technologies. Furthermore, environmental problems may also be considered one of the most possible reasons for the hunger. To elaborate, our surroundings has been more contaminated due to gas emission and a great deal of toxic waste being thrown away directly to the eco-system. This will lead to the creation of another phenomenon so-called ‘the acid rain’, which has not only eroded the fertile soils, but also left its mark on the edible plants and hence reducing the amount of food for human.
To address the problem, people should take action immediately by following these remedies below. Firstly, the officials need to provide subsidies for the beneficiaries who are the disadvantaged or those who are poor peasants. They can supply some basic staples like rice, meat, water, etc. to them or give them lands to cultivate. Secondly, besides making an advancement in the facilities, they ought to deal with the weather conditions by investing more expenditure in updating the meteorological systems in order to reduce the loss of bumper crops. Last but not least, in terms of each individual, one should get used to being self-sufficient in food; for example, he or she can grow their own plants, raise poultry or cattle so as to decrease the rate of being hungry in the long run.
In conclusion, even though there exist some reasons for the problem, there are also several viable solutions to tackle it.
- Some people say that the experiences a child has before starting school have the most influence on their future life Others say that experiences as a teenager esp at school is more influential Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work what will the consequences of this What solutions can you offer 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- Some people think that offenders should be put in prison Others however believe that providing offenders with education and training is more effective than putting them in prison Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 729, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...eir own plants, raise poultry or cattle so as to decrease the rate of being hungry in th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95334019359 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63025210084 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6813230596 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180462429011 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501637200113 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328993534014 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095860370295 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427446440277 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.