Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources (the Internet or television). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Educators’ responsibilities are giving lessons to students, and most children go to school to learn when they reach a proper age. It is undenied that schools are the most common way for children to gain understanding of things. However, in my opinion, students can approach to knowledge from other sources more than only from schools.
Students actually learn more from their parents and friends, who are the most familiar with them. Family is where one is born and is nourished. Thus, it is no doubt about the influence of parents with the formation of children’s knowledge as parents are the ones who students spend most of their time with. When children reach teenager, they have more time outside their home and make friends. During this time, friends who are in the same age range are given the priority to discuss and share the stories as they can lend a more effective ear which meet youngsters’ needs.
Besides, along with the bursting of digital era, internet also plays an important role in education. As whole libraries are being made available online and it costs nothing more than a second to search for information, internet has gradually become the practice tool of learning. It is clear that most of students nowadays give Internet the priority to solve any academic problems.
In conclusion, there are many sources of learning which are much more effective and time-saving for students to acquire knowledge than just learn from their tutors. The best method of learning is having a balanced combination of diverse sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | Trandinhphuc8.0 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | ctbx312 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | vuthuhien1510 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers Summarise the information by selec
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003
- The line graph shows the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...ctice tool of learning It is clear that most of students nowadays give Internet the priority to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, however, second, so, thus, in conclusion, no doubt, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91050583658 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48322202357 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544747081712 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 257.0 20.2975951904 1266% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1262.0 106.682146367 1183% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 257.0 20.7667163134 1238% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 90.0 7.06120827912 1275% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265703979021 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.265703979021 0.084324248473 315% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166054194168 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371350925239 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 130.2 13.0946893788 994% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -180.92 50.2224549098 -360% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 102.3 11.3001002004 905% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.68 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.7 8.58950901804 229% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 9.78957915832 552% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 104.8 10.1190380762 1036% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.