Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Socializing online is becoming increasingly popular among people whereas the traditional way of socialization has become less attractive. In my opinion, this is a negative development as socialization online cause dissatisfaction in relationships, lead to isolation, and create other problems in life.
One severe problem that socializing online can cause is that it can be harmful to real-life relationships that exist in the lives. In other words, as people become more interested in making friends online and spend time with them, has led to less interaction with people such as blood relatives and blood relatives. As a result of this, existing relationships with the people who are more meaningful in our lives has been ignored and becoming distant from each other.
Another issue with people who are making online friends that they can go to self-isolation. People who do online friendships and spend time chatting online usually prefer to stay alone at home and avoid meeting with friends and family get to gather. Initially, they feel comfortable with this routine but sooner or later this can push them towards isolation which can result in depression and mental trauma
Finally, individuals who choose to online interaction can face difficulties in their lives as they connect with people who can be with fake identities on social plate form and hiding their characteristics. This can be revealed immediately or after several years later while nothing can undo the loss that would already be suffered. Specifically, teenagers are more vulnerable, as they are more impressionable and tend to post pictures online or sharing with online which can resurface in later years of life and may cause embarrassment to them and their family as well.
In conclusion, although it is now in trend to make friends online and spend time on different social media application, it has also brought a different kind of problems in human life such as dissatisfaction in relationship with close family members and peers, isolation in life, and emotional setbacks from fake identities.
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 56
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it positive or negative development 78
- In Some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...sult in depression and mental trauma Finally individuals who choose to online intera...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20481927711 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93701728753 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490963855422 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 332.0 20.2975951904 1636% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1728.0 106.682146367 1620% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 332.0 20.7667163134 1599% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 130.0 7.06120827912 1841% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129705438926 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129705438926 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739375160543 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033101418853 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 169.1 13.0946893788 1291% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -273.96 50.2224549098 -545% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 134.0 11.3001002004 1186% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.36 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.53 8.58950901804 274% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 67.0 9.78957915832 684% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 134.8 10.1190380762 1332% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 10.7795591182 223% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.