Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
There can be no doubt that the topic of adolescents' preference for virtual meetings deserves some analysis. It is this writer's opinion that improved time efficiency is the reason for this phenomenon. Yet, flexible in-person meeting organizations can be adapted to help tackle the problem.
The factor for the case is enhanced quality of time usage. In modern life, the vast majority of teenagers tend to have a hectic schedule laden with work ranging from domestic domain to their schools, namely household chores, homework and school projects. As a result, they have to cope with high stress levels stemming from an excessive amount of work. To deal with, adolescents would resort to online meetings, which not only offer flexible time management but also assist in alleviating stress and improving productivity. To contextualize, for students to flexibly attend club meetings in addition to working on multiple projects simultaneously, they need to conduct them in a digital format such as Google Meet or Zoom.
To promote in-person interactions among teenagers, versatile meeting organization is requisite. In particular, they can either have a detailed discussion on each person's availability or decide on a formal setting for optimal arrangement. Subsequently, this would accentuate the significance of the meeting while helping everyone involved best appreciate the time they spend. Ultimately, it helps increase the chance of success when attracting teenagers to engage in physical interaction. For instance, when two teenage friends wish to meet up, they should go to great lengths to see when their counterpart is available instead of quitting from the first attempt.
It can be seen that predilection for virtual interaction among teenagers is the outcome of increased time flexibility. Nevertheless, versatile arrangement can be an effective resolution for the issue.
- Many people think that men should go out to work while woman s place is in the home To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 84
- Task 2 Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The bar chart below illustrates five different industries percentage share of Country B s economy in 1995 and 2015 with a forecast for 2025 89
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ings deserves some analysis. It is this writers opinion that improved time efficiency i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...format such as Google Meet or Zoom. To promote in-person interactions among te...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ther have a detailed discussion on each persons availability or decide on a formal sett...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in addition, in particular, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53979238754 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06121420926 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643598615917 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7891001206 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188173752682 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667995568263 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360086410414 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118018905663 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395668442995 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.