Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f

Essay topics:

Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.

Why do you think this is the case?

What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

These days, the shift from face-to-face to online communication has become widespread among young people. While this change can be attributed to numerous factors, I firmly believe that different solutions can be also adopted to promote real communication among the youngsters.

The tendency of online communication between young people can be explained by two primary reasons. Firstly, the modification of feature of urban living, as well as the increase in population density has led to the speculation of high-rise buildings and expansion traffic infrastructure provision. As a results, the availability of playgrounds for young people has been alleviated, discouraging them from participating in outside activities. Secondly, the evolution of electronic media also allows the youngster to keep in touch and communicate with their friends an family more conveniently. Instead of wasting expenditure and time for commuting and transportation, instant communication tend to be regarded as an appropriate approach for the youths to economize, while they are financially struggling with increasing burden from their study or running family homes.

Despite the aforementioned reasons, national and local authorities can impose different measures to encourage young people to spend more time on meeting other in person. Firstly, different policies should be implemented for the regulation of property planning to reduce the building of unnecessary housing stocks or towering sky scrappers to make way for the construction of more free-access playgrounds or entertaining spaces for the youngsters. Secondly, educational institutions should also organize more compulsory extra-curriculum activities to enhance social bonding between each other. These outside activities can be also accompanied with different tasks involving teamwork between, which help the students aware of the paramount importance of being a good team-players. Finally, different campaigns should be also employed to raise the awareness about the consequences stemming from sedentary lifestyles, which can pose a high threat for both physical and mental health of the youngsters.

In conclusion, the change in communication customs among young people in contemporary days can be ascribed to several reasons, I would argue that several measures can be adopted to encourage the youngsters to modify their habits into a more positive aspect.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-10 ktoan 56 view
2023-07-22 tharooo 78 view
2023-07-20 dooxeiy 89 view
2023-07-01 tieuquynh 89 view
2023-06-27 huyeen 89 view
Essays by user hi.nguyn91 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...on traffic infrastructure provision. As a results, the availability of playgrounds for yo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ouch and communicate with their friends an family more conveniently. Instead of wa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87179487179 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28414285207 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5910273692 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.538461538 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113481553465 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439015573738 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046432922223 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716768557487 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219237764673 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.