The top priority of businesses is making money, and they do not need to have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One school of thought holds that corporations should focus on generating profits instead of having public responsibilities. While I accept that this perception is somewhat justifiable, I believe that companies are necessitated to serve society.
On the one hand, it is understandable that to grow a business, money is indispensable for companies. Firstly, the cash flow from firms which is extremely abundant could contribute to the development of their countries. Consequently, the more taxes are paid by conglomerates, the more opportunities for cutting-edge equipment and high-tech facilities might be invested by authorities, leading to numerous inhabitants’ demands such as health care and recreation being served. Secondly, the expansion of remunerative companies is an undertaking for a stable job market. It can be perfectly explained by the fact that since there is no corporation going bankrupt, the rates of mass dismissal could no longer be gained, thereby, numerous employees can be able to embark on a steady job.
On the other hand, there is a host of compelling reasons as to why I am convinced that corporate social responsibility is an issue that is significantly imperative for even the smallest company. The first reason is that businesses must be forced to be responsible for environmental degradation. This is particularly the case of Formosa in Viet Nam a few years ago, due to their elimination of millions of tones of lethal sewage on the East Sea, a huge number of marine species such as coastal were on the verge of extinction, as a result, their production process was put under the legal control and its relevant managers had to compensate for their biological indifference. Another reason is that in the fight against social problems, assistance from firms is considerably fundamental. A prime example is that a prosperous charitable fund was established by Vin Group last month, facilitating the construction of various unprofitable healthcare center, educational equipment, and recreational facilities which not only adapting the elemental needs of orphaned children but also the ones who have lived below the poverty line in my nation.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that putting a high priority on monetary matters is reasonable, I would contend that taking philanthropic actions on society is essential for corporates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-22 | buahkiwienak | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-22 | buahkiwienak | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons What are the effects on family life and society 89
- When choosing a job salary is the most important decision To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree and disagree about this option 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42162162162 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36416035173 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635135135135 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.1230654856 49.4020404114 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.307692308 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4615384615 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0637971799412 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0232547409552 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236144788454 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0338581871795 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232404895165 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.