Topic Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Topic: Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone.
Discuss both views and give your opinion?

Some people believe in group work instead of individual will bring more productively . From my perspective, both team work and personal work have each advantage which are suitable in each situation.
Group studying can bring huge advantages regarding helping in time is one of them. Supporting always become necessarily in term of having successful. It is demonstrated by work divided reasonably; that mean the job would become professional though doing by high knowledge- person. Another reason, group learning can be possible and beneficial is the enhancement of learning skills from real-life and outstanding individuals in groups. This confirms that group learning improves the ability to communicate and collaborate among members. Tthrough which group study will definitely help in difficult jobs.
Cconversely, studying alone can also bring many other benefits and be effective in other cases. Firstly, if group learning has limitations because it depends on the level of each individual, self-study can make this difficulty meaningless. Ssecondly, learning alone is also a method to improve the ability to find information, read documents as well as access to today's intelligent computing platforms. In short, self-study is also a necessary skill that every individual must have to enhance his or her own level.
In cinclusions, group study or self-study has advantages and disadvantages; they complement each other. And in order to achieve that ability, both must be combined

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-13 PhuongPhoebe 82 view
2021-09-15 phg_phg 73 view
2021-08-19 nguyendangquang.aspect 61 view
2021-08-19 nguyendangquang.aspect 56 view
2021-08-18 dnnghha 92 view
Essays by user nguyendangquan… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... individual will bring more productively . From my perspective, both team work and...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, in short, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59734513274 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05357214091 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4760193785 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3571428571 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205942290939 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748850674396 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662140526168 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131711080638 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300638036482 0.056905535591 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.