In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some nations have a miniscule uber-rich class with huge income. Part of society is of the opinion that this is necessary and advantageous to the region's growth and prosperity. However, others think that there should be a higher limit to the income earned by an individual.
On one hand, a higher salary to a certain amount of people in a country boosts economic growth. Increased income means more spending which in turn results in higher taxes to the government. For example, the high net-worth individuals spend lavishly on luxury items and services and thus end up paying heavy taxes. Additionally, they invest in new upcoming businesses creating new jobs and therefore contributing to the economic growth of the region.
On the other hand, higher income to a few increases the gap between the rich and poor resulting in detrimental factors to rise in society. For instance, most developing counties are plagued with issues such as poverty, crime, corruption due to the elite rich and the depraved poor classes.
In my opinion, the government should increase the poverty line if it notices that there is a huge divide between the rich and the poor and tax the high-income individuals heavily. Moreover, governments should also subsidize items for the poor and generously grant welfare to the poor as an attempt to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor.
In conclusion, both sides have valid point in the argument. Nations should be constantly vigilant and should try to make sure her citizens do not feel neglected. However, each nation should look at this problem individually and should pass laws and place safeguard to avoid the repair the divide between the rich and the poor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
...is is necessary and advantageous to the regions growth and prosperity. However, others ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02473498233 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65878930321 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586572438163 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1835598028 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132866810704 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460304462478 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351072074018 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716532195388 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242666142855 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.