More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the favourite for well-known products is gradually growing. While there are some clear reasons for this trend, I believe that it is a negative development.
The reasons for the increasing consumer concern with brand names are simple to explain. First, the marketing departments of large corporations aim to identify their goods with a glamorous and successful lifestyle, and people are easily swayed by advertises. Companies often use celebrity endorsements to promote their products, with famous people like Cristiano Ronaldo or Victoria Beckham. Second, the possession of a high-priced car or a luxurious handbag advertises one’s wealth and taste. Therefore, the idea behind owning a brand name is to revoke the jealousy and temptation of others.
However, I would argue that this is a negative development. At an individual scale, consumers are encouraged by corporations to buy items that they barely afford because they believe that these products would improve their lives and make them happy. As a consequence, those customers squander their savings on brand-name products and become in debt. From a social perspective, such messages are very harmful, which might encourage crime to steal the latest cell phones from people in the street. The target audience is often young people, who companies seek to attract by promoting brand awareness of their products such as Nike or Samsung. These products now have been essential items to have in our modern global village.
In conclusion, there are some important reasons to explain why many people find brand-name products so attractive. Those reasons may be reasonable; however, I still believe that this kind of consumerism gives people a false consciousness about our real world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-23 | Hanachan123456789 | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-14 | ttranglo | 73 | view |
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can be able to make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- You have recently started work in a new company Write a letter to a friend In your letter Explain why you changed your jobs Describe your new job Tell him her your other news 73
- You ordered a new cheque book from your bank two weeks ago but you have received nothing Write a letter to the manager complaining about the bad service Say when and how you ordered the cheque book Ask how much longer you will have to wait and ask the man 73
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hose reasons may be reasonable; however, I still believe that this kind of consum...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43223443223 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8547515117 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630036630037 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.088163649 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139021728947 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445719285417 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023600847747 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811381964746 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193442610772 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.