More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Do you agree or disagree?
A growing number of well-educated professionals are migrating from developing to developed countries as skilled laborers in sectors such as Information Technology, Science and Engineering. A part of the population is of the opinion that by enabling and allowing this migration, nations are thieving from poorer nations. The rest of the populace believes that this is merely demand and supply in play. I completely agree with the former and in this essay, I would be explaining the reason as to why I think so.
Firstly, specialists in various technological and scientific areas are scarce resource all around the globe. Every country must groom and grow their future workforce by investing time, energy and effort. Therefore, allowing them to leave the country to serve another would be highly ill-advised.
Secondly, knowledge is an invaluable asset and could shape the future of a nation. Intelligent and skilled professionals eventually become the pillars of society and the country's economy in the future. For instance, technological and medical advancements achieved by foreign individuals are often attributed to the country they reside in. However, these individuals could have accomplished the same in their home country and boosted their economy due to it.
Lastly, developing countries need assistance and guidance from developed countries. Rich nations should provide skilled laborers and resources to enable underdeveloped nations to develop faster.
In conclusion, countries should value and safeguard their resources and use them to improve the nation. Every nation should share and learn from each other’s advancements instead of the stealing from their neighbors and counterparts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67704280156 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05545846509 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5953307393 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9300328011 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171476086744 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535064790901 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338468936157 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927649146447 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151251257106 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.