Most people believe that stricter punishment should be given for traffic offences. To what extent do you agree?
Certainly, increasing traffic offences in metropolis are becoming a serious issue for the government. Although authorities are doing their best in lowering the traffic crimes by introducing rigid laws, I believe that more stricter rules and regulations require to create fear and discipline in people.
To start, with regards to the adolescents, relaxing traffic punishment has a harmful effect on the society. Firstly, youngsters do not pay much attention to lose law, and ultimately, it leads to making an unethical society in long run. Secondly, following traffic regulations owing to strict punishments help in building disciple in mass people, which is very important to bring in the character of today's community. After all, discipline is the most vital aspect of the human life. For example, minimal fine amount is being charged in India for jumping a red light or on not wearing a seat belt while driving a four-wheeler; however, on breaking of same traffic rules in Hong Kong can cost a person to thousand dollars. Therefore, it is very important to increase penalty to cope with traffic violations.
In addition, it has been seen that a country with the harden traffic punishments or laws has lower crime rates. Undoubtedly, it helps the authorities not to deal with the daily offences, and therefore, they can increase their productivity and efficiency by investigating other crimes. Lastly, loosen traffic law may lead to fearful accidents, which is an awful crime in itself. Moreover, with increase of traffic punishments problems particularly, road rage will come to an end, which usually a reason of unrest in the society. For instance, recently, it was published in TOI newspaper that a person shot to dead in a road rage after his car had allegedly hit the accused's car. Such violences are massive destruction to the societies.
On the other side, however, while I believe that any chance should not be given to the culprit of road offence to go easy, I agree that some new road users ought to be given an amount of liberty due to their mental circumstances while driving on the roads. On the contrary, such small instances of breaching law should not affect any person or society by any mean. It is only good until they keep learning a lesson from such mistakes.
To conclude, although some freedom may be acceptable for new vehicle users depending on their cases and situations, in my view stricter traffic punishment is a great solution to end the origin of other crimes such as accidents and road rages.
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on local works rather than showing the cultures or artworks from other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people join distance learning programmes study material post TV Internet and study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does Do you agree or disagree 89
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work shopping and education To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration for many Others however prefer different other aspects of a job over the salary they earn In your opinion what are the most important aspects of a job 89
- Some people say that in our modern age it is unnecessary to teach children about the skills of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stricter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stricter
... introducing rigid laws, I believe that more stricter rules and regulations require to create...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: creating
... stricter rules and regulations require to create fear and discipline in people. To st...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...rules in Hong Kong can cost a person to thousand dollars. Therefore, it is very importan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n, it has been seen that a country with the harden traffic punishments or laws has lower c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, after all, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01184834123 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80517179364 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.187754968 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94444444444 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257913898578 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661236089917 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515358853419 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139812329157 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357101354921 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.