In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes

Essay topics:

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Write at least 250 words.

Railway plays a significant role in transportation in any country and required frequent service and maintenance for smooth running and in many countries, some people think new railway lines should be constructed for fast trains between cities by spending big chunk of money. On the other side, some advice that money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. In his essay I will discuss both the views and will enlighten my opinion in the following essay.

It is crucial to maintain the public transportation in the city, especially railways. Because, railway is the cheapest source of transportation among all the available one. Also a train can carry large numbers of passengers and goods, also can reduce the congestion. Japan's reliable and speedy bullet train shows the overall development of the country. However, constructing new railways lines for fast travelling between the cities could be quite expensive for any country and may shake the whole country's budget of development. Additionally, due to increase in population and less space of living, finding space for laying railway lines also will be a big task.

On the opposite side, some people favour to spend money to improve the existing public transportation. This way government can also save a big portion of their investments as maintenance required less capital as compared to constructing new railway lines. Improving modes of transportation is also essential as it represent the overall status of a country. Moreover, encourage and attract the international tourism.

In conclusion, government should focus on strengthening the transportation systems by frequently deploying services for maintenance. Also it is feasible to improve the existing public transportation because of less capital requirement and its scope for future to tackle increasing demand of transportation.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-07 Vivi_peach 67 view
2023-01-18 Behnaz.babayani 73 view
2021-11-23 mina_sharifi 84 view
2021-07-16 aaaudrey43 78 view
2020-10-11 S.Ranaut 78 view
Essays by user sahilshell :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ation in the city, especially railways. Because, railway is the cheapest source of tran...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...sportation among all the available one. Also a train can carry large numbers of pas...
^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he available one. Also a train can carry large numbers of passengers and goods, a...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'represents'?
Suggestion: represents
... transportation is also essential as it represent the overall status of a country. Moreov...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...tly deploying services for maintenance. Also it is feasible to improve the existing ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50347222222 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15655175186 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0498052083 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464757709186 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133942040124 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12826686827 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272185899988 0.151304729494 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144289855427 0.056905535591 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.