Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects o

Essay topics:

Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.

Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.

Employers are always seeking ways to enhance their employee’s productivity, and subsiding healthy pursuits may be one way of achieving this. There are arguments on both the sides, which will discuss here.

On the one hand, it might be said that if workers are fitter and healthier, their working time will be more efficient, leading to higher levels of output and services. Furthermore, the work/life balance will be highly improved, because their leisure time will be more fulfilling. Sedentary lifestyle, recent times, working long hours behind a desk would increase the employee’s stress, which could be reduced when encourage playing sports. This may even be motivating than pay increments, perks or financial rewards such as bonuses and incentives. Finally, they might be feeling healthier which is itself a motivating factor.

Conversely, some are the opinion that spending resources for leisure activities may be impotent to the employees rather could use it to enhance their skills which can measurable. It also might be said that ongoing training or day release training programme may help to achieve careers progression and have better job prospects. Added to this is the lack of skill of employees may be reduced immensely, leading to fortify the relationship between employers and staff. Lastly, this may also reduce the risk of redundancy if the company restructures, downsizes or outsources its workforce.

In conclusion, it seems to me that, while the company spend budgets for leisure activities, training the employees also necessary. Spending funds on ongoing training would appear to be a better use of company financial resources.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-07 Aman.Kansal1234 78 view
2019-11-28 JayinOZ 78 view
2019-11-08 Karthikielts 78 view
2019-07-03 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2019-02-19 akbar bakhtiari 61 view
Essays by user Karthikielts :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, furthermore, if, lastly, may, so, while, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44787644788 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91066431022 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598455598456 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5344034242 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.538461538 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154555992835 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618232459921 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488739437464 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990861333774 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555015586272 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.