Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets and there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets and there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In recent time a debate has been very popular among people wheather the relevance of cinema will continue or will it be end, as there are several other means of watching films are available like smart phones and other electronic devices. I strongly beleive that people interest in film talkies house will remian alive at the same time I admit that there are sevral other modes of streaming the video contents have emerged in course of time and a substantial amount of viewers have shifted to them and they are finding it more worth in terms of convienence.
At first, hand held devices like mobile and laptops are offering more flexibility and control for example we can play , pause and resume movies whenever we want and we have full control over play time like we can repeat, fast forward a video according to our convienence. In result many people have opted them as a well worth source of watching movies. Such trend not only benefited spectatures but also movies itself; According to a survey conducted on movie viewers, it has suggested that many old movies have been watched now due to mobile phones; thus several unrecognised movies with good content got fame and appricication later on.
Whereas, cinema has its own advantages and unique features that is why it has kept its popularity maintaned and it will keep going. Over the period of time we have seen many evolution in cinemas like technology and seating arrangement and other facilites. Constant refinement is key need for any industry to maintain its charm and popularity same enhancement is quite evident in cinemas like better sound system high definition screen relay and multiscreen picture houses. These all features are attarcting people towards cinema becuase it is always a different experience in watching films at theathre as it is providing a movie centric atmosphere which can not be achived on mobile phones.
To conclude, In my opinion we may see a spike in movie viewers on phone and laptops but people affection towards cinema will remain intact. Neverthless, it is convinenet and easy to see videos on phone but the atmosphere and ambiance that cinema offeres is impaccable.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... phones and other electronic devices. I strongly beleive that people interest in film talkies ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lity and control for example we can play , pause and resume movies whenever we wan...
^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ntaned and it will keep going. Over the period of time we have seen many evolution in cinemas ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evolution seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much evolution', 'a good deal of evolution'.
Suggestion: much evolution; a good deal of evolution
...g. Over the period of time we have seen many evolution in cinemas like technology and seating ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94505494505 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58765056519 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568681318681 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9963084491 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.636363636 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0909090909 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22271345529 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878871149071 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048781633155 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140112664387 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479245616367 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 9.78957915832 271% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 10.7795591182 250% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.