Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory. To what extent do you agree?
The major subject of debate in our education system is to decide curriculum for students. Some people strongly advocate the independence of students to choose their subjects for their curriculum while other did not agree as it might hamper their knowledge foundation. Though, I do support the idea of declaring difficult subjects as optional such as mathematics and philosophy.
Few people have rigid mentality therefore they don’t support the idea of giving freedom to the students to opt out of the difficult subjects. Providing freedom from childhood to choose which is convenient and easy for them will eventually spoil school students and will not learn to step out of their comfort zone. For instance, if a child was force to learn all the subjects irrespective of their interest and difficulty level, provide them confidence that they can also achieve success by stepping out of their comfort zone.
Whereas, some people believe that subjects like mathematics and philosophy which were usually found troublesome by majority of school going children should be made non-compulsory. Such few tuff subjects might demotivate students and hamper their overall education. Instead, if they were allowed to choose the subjects which interest them will not only improve their performance but also give them clarity for further studies and future. Many studies are showing that if a child is given freedom to decide the field of their interest will become more successful in future.
The debate on allowing freedom to the students to opt for the subject to study by their own is never ending. While few support the idea, others will decline. In my opinion, it is the right of every individual to pursue the field of studies of their capacity and interest, so that they can give cent percent of their efforts and will study without pressure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-03 | ishween kaur | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | MrIshtpreet | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | M.Nazeem Shifnas | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-07 | pushpak | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | nands71191 | 61 | view |
- In many cities many people are living in high rise apartment blocks Does this accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages 84
- Some people believe online reading material should only be used for a child to learn to read whereas others believe only printed material should be used Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Write a letter to your neighbours In your letter explain the reason for the noise apologise for the noise describe what action you will take 73
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth rather than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To What extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun tuff seems to be countable; consider using: 'few tuffs'.
Suggestion: few tuffs
...en should be made non-compulsory. Such few tuff subjects might demotivate students and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ir interest will become more successful in future. The debate on allowing freedom to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, as for, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12624584718 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60654043624 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514950166113 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6447653855 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.692307692 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160401314018 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658375725485 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715778664645 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110136987302 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745608038787 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.