Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper.”
To the extent that it is preferable to read books on an electronic device rather than traditional books on paper, I strongly disagree with this statement. Some people believe that reading is vital regardless of where it comes from. However, reading, in my opinion, is not only the major motto, but it is also the key motto to fully comprehend the book and all of its feelings while doing so. Reading a book on paper is easier than reading a book on an electronic device, which is why we recommend reading on paper whenever possible. On paper, we can highlight some of the most important words and sentences that we find interesting in books. We are unable to mark it on the electronic equipment.
The use of an electronic gadget to read has the potential to be harmful to our eyes in particular situations. Some people claim that their devices have a reading mode, but this does not ensure the health of their eyes. Reading on paper is not harmful to our eyes in any way. In addition, research reveals that when we read on paper, we are more likely to recall the location of a certain chapter or a specific sentence than when we read on an electronic device.
When opposed to paper books, electronic devices offer a number of advantages. For example, users can instantly determine the meaning of a word when using an electronic device. However, this does not imply that reading on an electronic device is a smart choice in every situation. When we read on an electronic device, it is vital that the device is fully charged or at least partially charged before we can begin reading. This is not the case, however, with paper books.
At the end of the day, I want to emphasize that it is entirely up to each individual to decide whether they prefer to read on paper or on an electronic device. However, I prefer to read on paper.
- What are the characteristics of a good coach 73
- Describe a fear you had to overcome How did you overcome it 60
- Describe an annual day in your country when you give people special gifts 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, at least, for example, in addition, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54848484848 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55970936424 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463636363636 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.632072899 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2941176471 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451438703964 0.236089414692 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162565988699 0.076458572812 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140234938902 0.0737576698707 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286236841752 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114497236595 0.0645574589148 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.