Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From the dawn of the word, it was very important for the human being to control other people. In this circumstance, ones, especially the strongest person in every community, had been trying to direct other according to his or her attitude and desire. A plethora of people have the conviction that the leadership and conducting other toward the success is not a hereditary feature. Others, on the other hand, take a totally different point of view and refuted this idea. By considering different factors into consideration, I vehemently agree with the first viewpoint for manifold reasons. In the ensuing line, I will elaborate on two reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first and most exquisite reason which coming to the mind to substantiate my standpoint is that there are manifold successful leaders that grown up in an ordinally family and vice versa. If the leadership was a hereditary skill, it would not possible for this prominent leaders to flourish and reach on the pinnacle of their goals. Take the Gandhi, the leader of India revolution, as an example, he was born in a general family. In fact, living in this condition not only disappointment Gandhi from his goals But conducted him towards a great success.
The other equally important reason, if not more, is that the ability in which a person, a human being can control and direct the other ones, is a kind of knowledge. Admittedly, the knowledge can be acquired only by deep study and receive experience from a master instructor or by her or himself, respectively. Take my own experience as an example, when I was an elementary school student, one day our teacher divided some of my peers and me into several groups and asked me to direct one of that groups to do a school project. In that time since I do not have enough knowledge and experience, it was difficult for me to manage and conduct other ones. Finally, we finished that assignment; our work, especially my work as a leader, was not very good but, working in a group and directing other ones provided me good experience that helped us in the future.
To make a long story short, by taking all the aforementioned reasons into consideration, I strongly disagree with the opinion that "leadership ability'' comes naturally. I hope the people that do not think same as me, increase their self-esteem and become aware of their skills for accepting leadership in different place. By doing so, seldom can they lose anything since at the worst circumstance they can gain some experience that will be beneficial for their future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Shiimaaa | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | MRoy | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | mohammadkmi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | marysv | 70 | view |
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 70
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 70
- Essay topics: TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('ordinally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('family') instead of another adjective.
...old successful leaders that grown up in an ordinally family and vice versa. If the leadership was a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88073394495 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86858303386 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529816513761 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8256232966 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.222222222 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143650153155 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445428513634 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376630079625 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899719112594 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317517544232 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.