Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more import than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
The teacher is a profession which people have a high demand and totally respectful. Being a teacher should acquire a lot of skills. Sometimes people claim that relate well to students are more crucial than having professional knowledge. However, generally speaking, I think that it is more important for teachers have excellent knowledge of the course for them taught than having an ability to relate well with students.
First of all, it is significant to consider class performance. If and only if, teachers give students amazing performance in class who have a good understanding of knowledge. They comprehended knowledge so well that they can help students acquire knowledge easier and can make students wish to study. For example, I can recall one of my teachers who taught me linear algebra. His mathematical knowledge is extremely great and his performance was really exciting that help me and other students to have a better understanding about subspace theory which I thought is very difficult for me once and let us be more interesting about linear algebra. Fascinating class performance has a positive effect on students to learn knowledge.
In addition, teachers have extremely great knowledge about the subject which they taught to mean that student can learn more useful knowledge and more cutting-edge technologies than teachers who just have an ability to relate well with students. Most students want to acquire knowledge in the class more than making friend with teachers. I can recall when I was a freshman at the university, my roommate recommended me to choose an optional course which the teacher had a good communication with students and willing to make friends with students. Nevertheless, her subject knowledge was too outdated to teach students so that most time of lesson she chose to chat with students rather than teaching us new knowledge. Most students in this class felt totally boring by her behavior, which proves that having good relations with students is not better than having a great subject knowledge.
To make a review, in my opinion, I am deeply convinced that teacher who has incredibly great academic knowledge of the subject is more pivotal than relating students really well given that teachers can have higher class performance, more attractive to students, and teach knowledge which is state of art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 864, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[6]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great subject knowledge'.
Suggestion: great subject knowledge
...with students is not better than having a great subject knowledge. To make a review, in my opinion, I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, well, as to, for example, i think, in addition, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19947506562 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83331844111 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448818897638 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.1650141141 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8125 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314435117364 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120698805278 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836965780342 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221378823166 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721558079712 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.