Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.

By and large, it's established beyond doubt that having friends make people happier. Personally stated, I am of the conviction of that old friends have more influence on our happiness rather new ones. In what follows, I will delve into the crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.

One compelling reason that corroborating my idea is that they have many shared memmories with each other. It is crystal clear that passing more time with friends cause we feel more dependency to them. In fact having this sense of love with friends make us happiers. By the way of illustration, my mother have a friend from her school period. They like each other just like a sister. And when my mother is sad, calls her and after that she will be happy.

Another reason that cannot go unnoticed is that we have more trust to our old friends. Indeed through passing several years with friends cause we know them better. Also, we can see their behaviors and reactions in different situations. For instanse, we can find them trustable to tell a secret or not. After some years we can select some of them as our closest friend. And we can consult with them since facing a problem. The noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recently conducted research in our country show that having a few old friends cause people feel happy during their life and release tenssions of life.

By pursuing the above paragraphs, one can infer that having just a small group of old friends is a decisive factor in happiness of person. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating: first, people have done many share thing with their old friends; second, they have more trust to their old friends.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-03 sonyeoso 80 view
2023-04-10 KimiaKermanshahian 76 view
2023-03-15 MichelleGAOOO 70 view
2022-12-14 HSNDEK 73 view
2022-11-24 AT2G38040 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Philofan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
... we have more trust to our old friends. Indeed through passing several years with frie...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 488, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently conducted research'.
Suggestion: recently conducted research
...ly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recently conducted research in our country show that having a few o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, in fact, by and large, by the way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 295.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82711864407 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52905892389 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569491525424 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8726059809 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1111111111 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174951560904 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599199978796 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464152893086 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11571094095 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244235985768 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.