It is a waste of money for governments fund to space travel or space exploration
Currently, there is an increasing number of countries distributing lots of funds to develop its technology in space exploration so as to get the upper hand in the world arm rivalry, however some individuals contend that pouring money to develop technology is a waste of money and there are a bunch of domains waiting for the authority to sponsor. Personally speaking, I concur with this opinion and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, education, especially the tertiary education, still needs the regime to allocate money to enhance its development. Nowadays, in order to win the battle of trade competition, each country spares no effort to attract talents in varieties of domains related with the international trade, such as finance, marketing, advertisement, tax revenue and so on, which constitutes a stepping stone in their competition. Hence, at the aim of enabling our country to gain a competitive edge during the rivalry, we also need to amass more talents. However, it is widely acknowledged that it requires lots of money to attract talents, hence it is more efficient to allocate money to enhance our own education quality. Concretely, with the distribution from the authority, some universities or institutions are entitled to upgrade their facilities and equipment, thus rendering students a better ambiance or foundation to maximize their potentials, which probably contributes to the development of our national economy.
What’s more, it is evident that environmental contamination has become a serious problem, therefore, instead of expending money on exploring the outer space, I contend that allocating money to protect our environment is a money well spent. To be more specific, nowadays, due to the excessive construction both in rural and urban areas, the surrounding is deteriorated significantly. In addition, with the prevalence of private cars, the haze is also greatly intensified, which not only poses a threat to city dwellers’ respiratory systems but also exert detrimental effects on the economy. Meanwhile, the overexploitation further challenges the sustainable development of our country, which indicates that if we do not attach sufficient to the problem of energy security, we are likely to be confronted with the embarrassing situation that our economy is on the brink of collapse without usable energy. Therefore, with regard to the intense problem confronted with us, it is more urgent for the government to distribute more funds to address this issue. Space exploration, although plays a vital role in building national strengths, it cannot be equated with the significance of environmental protection, especially the importance of air purification, which is inextricably intertwined with each individual living in the same planet.
Admittedly, expending money on developing space travel has its perks, for instance, it helps we human beings to find replaceable planets suitable for our habituation. Nevertheless, all of these mentioned effects are based on the foundation that the earth is irreversibly contaminated, but provided that the regime endeavors to spend more funds to protect the environment through different measures, including elevating the qualities of education, advance the technology specialized in the well-being of environmental balance, it is needless for us to allocate money to explore the out space.
In a nutshell, owing to the importance of promoting education and environmental protection, the government’s behavior of funding to space travel is a waste of money and those funds from taxpayers are supposed to tackle the problems detrimental to their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | prakriti malla | 76 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | xinxindiandeng | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | xinxindiandeng | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | xinxindiandeng | 76 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | wxr031 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Some people prefer to buy technological devices as soon as they are available to the public Others people prefer to wait until many people have used them Which do you prefer 95
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 73
- it is better to relax by reading a book or watching a movie than doing physical exercise 67
- What is the most important factor that affect the lasting time of a friendship?help each other at difficult timehave same intereststrust each other completely 73
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep pursuing them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better and why? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...lop its technology in space exploration so as to get the upper hand in the world arm riv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'bunches'?
Suggestion: bunches
...ogy is a waste of money and there are a bunch of domains waiting for the authority to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, to start with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 91.0 52.1666666667 174% => OK
Nominalization: 39.0 8.0752688172 483% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3105.0 1977.66487455 157% => OK
No of words: 562.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52491103203 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31888694819 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 212.727598566 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 1002.6 618.680645161 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.1344086022 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.2254890025 48.9658058833 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.0625 100.406767564 193% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.125 20.6045352989 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303659613947 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951773427572 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11108835054 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208341091874 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106502406656 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.1 11.7677419355 188% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.03 58.1214874552 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.10430107527 239% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.1575268817 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.01818996416 130% => OK
difficult_words: 181.0 86.8835125448 208% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.0537634409 159% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.