Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Whether respecting the teacher was more in the past or not remains open to debate. There is a broad spectrum of opinion regarding this controversial issue. While some people believe that teachers are more valued nowadays, I contend that people respected more the teachers in the past. In the following paragraphs, I represented some reasons to support my views.
Admittedly, the teachers play a key role in the improvement of society culture. Being respectful of teachers can be a cause to respect people to each other in a society. In the past, a few number of people became a teacher was limited thus, most of parents appreciate the teachers due to learning their children in schools. Moreover, the number of people who are educated were not too much, consequently, the teachers were more valued in the society. For example, in the past, parents appreciated teachers endeavors by giving a present at the middle or end of academic year. In contrast, today, some teachers in several countries have to strike against pay gap.
In addition, the literacy rate was not appropriate in society in the past. Therefore, teachers were known as educated people and popularity among the others. On the contrary, nowadays, the higher percent of people in a society are educated thus, being a teacher does not have the same popularity as well. Also, traders and politicians tend to employ tutors for their children specifically for each course. Hence, the teachers are their employee, they might not communicate with teachers respectfully. In some cases, it was seen that they dismiss tutors violently.
To sum up, regarding the points mentioned above, Although, some of people believe that teachers are more valued by society in these days, I am strong of the conviction that people respected and appreciated more teachers in the past as they have had valuable position among all people in a society.
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 65
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea? 70
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...each other in a society. In the past, a few number of people became a teacher was limited ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the parents') or simply say ''most parents''.
Suggestion: most of the parents; most parents
...ople became a teacher was limited thus, most of parents appreciate the teachers due to learning...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 60, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the people') or simply say ''some people''.
Suggestion: some of the people; some people
...g the points mentioned above, Although, some of people believe that teachers are more valued b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, in some cases, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08306709265 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74926393121 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498402555911 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6683394325 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5882352941 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76470588235 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31490056954 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102195706497 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653295557703 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205568591251 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018625351796 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.