When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Many school projects have to be carried by groups since a single person's energy is limited when facing heavy burdens. And here is a claim that students tend to work more effectively when working together in a group than working alone. As far as I am concerned, I do not accede to this opinion. In a group project, there can be numerous dissenting voice when you speak out your opinion. What's more, it cannot be guaranteed that everyone is trying their best to complish the project, so the efficiency can be undermined.
To begin with, different people may have different opinions, which impedes the project from progressing. As the saying goes, "Too many cooks, spoil the broth". Sometimes when you have various people working in the same project, there can be so many differences and this always leads to argument. Due to everyone's distinct characteristics, people can have totally disparate views. Therefore, carrying on the project can be tremendously impeded.
Secondly, someone may not contribute a lot to the project, thus jeopardizing the efficacy of the projects. This is true because when working in a group, some people may feel unworried since they think there will always be someone else to finish the project. If everybody holds such opinions, then the project will never move forward. Besides, some people may not try their best to complete the project or even worse, they do not involve in the project. What I have experienced last semester can fully illustrate this point. We were assigned a group project last semester and we were required to work with at least five members. Then I made a team with my roommates. However, every time we made appointments to do the project, they were spending their time on something else. It was me who completed almost all the part the project.
On the contrary, studying alone can be more efficacious. Studying alone offers us a quiet atmospere where we can think independently. Besides, we can easily drive the direction of the project toward what we want. So we can definitely complete the project according to our own wills. At the same time, one's self-learning and independent ability can also get improved.
In conclusion, group projects sometimes can be problematic due to various individuals. But studying alone can avoid those drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... to be carried by groups since a single persons energy is limited when facing heavy bur...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... voice when you speak out your opinion. Whats more, it cannot be guaranteed that ever...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... so the efficiency can be undermined. To begin with, different people may have...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... project can be tremendously impeded. Secondly, someone may not contribute a l...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eted almost all the part the project. On the contrary, studying alone can be m...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...endent ability can also get improved. In conclusion, group projects sometimes ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06510416667 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79834279262 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7401385197 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.8076923077 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7692307692 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231489210994 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626570324166 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794312691716 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123226634656 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749856154289 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.