Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

By and large, management and increasing the workers' efficiency is among the important factors which are indispensable for companies’ progress. Especially, in the current era, in which the firms are faced with a tremendous competition to achieving more benefits. A plethora of company managers are of the conviction that doing the similar task is making workers more satisfied than the time they have to do similar work all they long. Others, on the other hand, have a totally different point of view. By considering the different aspect of these two policies, I am of the opinion the later proposal is more beneficial for both workers and companies. In the following paragraph, I will explain more about my standpoint.
The first and most exquisite point which come to my mind to substantiate my point of view is that doing similar work provided this ability to the worker to manage their works and tasks. In fact, when employees are aware of the task that they are going to do in the next day, they have more time to think about those works and make a design for doing them prior. In this condition, when they want to start they work-day, it is not required await to someone say that what they should do. As a result, they will start their tasks very soon and this provided more time to accomplish a lot of work which in turn satisfied they employer and bring about the reward for workers which make them happy.
The other equally important reason, if not more, is that working on the specific task every day increased workers skills. In this circumstance, its prevented employers from the attributing different person for doing one task. Consequently, the accuracy will be increased and since it is crystal clear that who work with a specific machine, the workers will struggle to keep that machine in a better way. So, it increased the machine lifetime and which in turn produced more that is beneficial for the company. So, this released the worker form every day fine because of damage which occurred in the machine. A survey which conducted recently approved this opinion and demonstrated that the workers who do one job during the day are more happy and successful than those one has to do different works.
To make a long story short, by considering all the aforementioned reasons and considering this fact that doing a work all day long may be boring, I am of the opinion that working on one specified work during the workday is more beneficial for both workers and employers.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 nusybah 70 view
2020-01-21 nusybah 66 view
2020-01-17 dentista1985 76 view
2020-01-05 naziii 83 view
2019-12-10 shrijan 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mhb66 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...nd large, management and increasing the workers efficiency is among the important facto...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, so, as to, in fact, as a result, by and large, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79118329466 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63728263852 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457076566125 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6207222144 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.470588235 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3529411765 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382430344883 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131076335048 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115553768539 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242426755433 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492236561204 0.0645574589148 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.