Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The main idea of both reading and lecture is about different kinds of a medical record. With this mind, the author points the idea that record of documents in electrical databases has several benefits over the paper base record. The lecturer refutes this claim, casting doubt on every single point made by the author.
First, the article asserts that the use of electronic records can reduce costs by saving money on storing and transporting the documents. Conversely, the professor brings up the idea that the advantage of electrical records is uncertain. Also, she states that keeping paper in the emergency condition is a really important matter in medical science. Thus, all off doctors have to keep these papers.
Second, the reading passage argues that electrical records are essential to decreasing the errors during recording. On the other hand, the speaker underlines that many doctors have a pen and paper to take note of the patients' condition. Afterward, the staff and nurses record these documents.
Finally, the passage holds the view that the electrical records are a vital point in the research and universities. In contrast, the professor dismisses the idea due to the fact that medical records and information in the US are really protected. Also, there are much-complicated policies for access to patients' documents. Thus, this reason is inconvenient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- Summary 3
- Do you agree or disagree?Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 73
- Do you agree or disagree?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 66
- Summary 3
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, if, really, second, so, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25454545455 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74650792555 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4178711107 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5714285714 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093769024108 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333860340775 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676808296766 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577208916353 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665994719956 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.