Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage.
The professor and reading have conflict of on the theory of how agnostids may have lived. Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Although the reading have some reasons for they behaviors, the professor asserts that they are too weak to get results.
Firstly, the reading claims that they would be free-swimming predator and were strong that haunted smaller animals. However, the professor argues with it. the professor says that by this reasoning, seems that they would have large eyes too track the small animals, on contrary to fossils ,they had small eyes to see, maybe they were blind and exploit other sensations to track the prey.
Secondly, according to the reading, they were marine animals and lived on the seafloor. Conversely, the professor refutes that by evidences that illustrate the were too fast to habitat on seafloors. Because of their fossils that have been every side of earth, it illustrates that they were not slow to localize just in one place and they could move in far distances. Plus their ability was unusual despite seafloor animals.
Lastly, the passage asserts that it were plausible for agnostids to were parasites for feeding larger organisms ,such as many species that exist as parasites ,such as fleas, ticks, etc. On contrary to the reading passage, the professor their population were too small and they killed off host animals.Substantial amount of fossils illustrate that agnotids' rolling out parasites.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 73
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 70
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to track'?
Suggestion: to track
..., seems that they would have large eyes too track the small animals, on contrary to fossi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he small animals, on contrary to fossils ,they had small eyes to see, maybe they w...
^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding, they were marine animals and lived on the seafloor. Conversely, the profess...
^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e parasites for feeding larger organisms ,such as many species that exist as paras...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... as many species that exist as parasites ,such as fleas, ticks, etc. On contrary t...
^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Substantial
... small and they killed off host animals.Substantial amount of fossils illustrate that agnot...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, however, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18106995885 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56903530935 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56378600823 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0537316629 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.916666667 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127738977227 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508616360013 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484093217613 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830939715405 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308020325318 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.