Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that some countries are trying to balance the economic development and the environmental reservation. However, whether this belief is possible or not is still argumentative.
On the one hand, I would advocate that keeping the economic development with the environmental protection is completely possible. The primary reason for this opinion is that when the government attracts a great deal of the investment from private sectors, including domestic or foreign organizations, they would generate much profit which significantly contributes to the national progress. As a result, the governments would have more money to measure various environmental issues, such as investing in water cleaning systems or constructing more rail services to limit the exhaust from the private vehicles. Besides, a non-polluted environment also brings a vast amount of profit to the very nation as it can be considered an attractive element for the tourism development. In fact, some countries were reputable for the hygienic environment such as Japan or Singapore often attract a huge amount of foreign arrivals annually, which partly helps to boost their economy
Although these reasons mentioned above are justifiable, I am convinced that a successful economy cannot co-exist with the environmental preservation. Firstly, the economic development is often accompanied by the mass production, which directly damages the environment. It is apparent that an increasing number of companies requests a vast amount of forests must be demolished. As a consequence, the natural habitats of wildlife animals will be disappeared, leading to the unsustainable balance ecosystem. An increase in number of vehicles served to the manufacture can be the secondly responsible for this problem. In fact, the businesses have to use a variety of means of transport to deliver goods and this would release a large amount of carbon emissions, causing global warming and rising sea level.
In conclusion, I think whether people accept or not, boosting economy still exercises a negative influence on the environment, therefore the government should produce better policies to balance both of the issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-30 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | caigicungduoc | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 96 | view |
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 78
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development 78
- People should look after their health for personal benefits rather than a duty for a society What extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organizational rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 63
- Developments in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems.Discuss both views and give 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 970, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich partly helps to boost their economy Although these reasons mentioned above a...
^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...policies to balance both of the issues.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57228915663 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19743351319 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593373493976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6400167776 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.307692308 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8461538462 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202886218232 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064286680411 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036653440233 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118530413528 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204193645233 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.