As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
The idea that, besides making money, enterprises also need to have public
responsibilities remains a source of controversy. In my opinion, while generating
profit is the top priority for each company, I agree thatthey should also conduct
their business in a socially responsible manner.
On the one hand, the efforts of companies to maximise their profits may have some
benefits for society as a whole. Firstly, the higher the profits earned by
enterprises, the more taxes they pay to the government. As a result, authorities
may have more revenue to spend in key fields, including education and health care,
which leads to an improvement in the quality of life of the whole community.
Secondly, by earning huge profits companies have the opportunity to grow their
business. For example, firms could use their capital to expand their production,
creating new job opportunities within the community.
On the other hand, there are strong reasons why businesses should also accept that
they have social responsibilities.The first reason is that their activities have an
effect on the environment. Without controls, production processes may result in
serious environmental degradation, such as global warming stemming from factory
emissions or the irresponsible disposal of industrial waste. For example, if
factories installed waste treatment systems instead of discharging chemical wastes
into rivers, water pollution could be controlled. Another reason is that
enterprises should help those who are less fortunate, since they have the money to
do so. For example, big corporations such as Unilever and Vinamilk have
enhanced their public image through philanthropic actions such as providing
scholarships and giving charitable donations.
In conclusion, although I recognise that making profits is the fundamental principle
of business, I would argue that all businesses should profoundly reflect upon their
social responsibilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide ( CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- Nowadays many jobs are more stressful and the working day is longer What are the reasons for this What can employers do to help employees 92
- People s opinions differ as to whether or not the usage of computers for educational purpose should be encouraged at schools Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is le 81
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010 67
- The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 16, column 35, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...that they have social responsibilities.The first reason is that their activities h...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82130584192 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18065324601 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649484536082 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5267140087 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.307692308 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 26.0 4.38176352705 593% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224617291226 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754143472438 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749288524649 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589677901739 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803666455163 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.