The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region.
The given bar chart presents the comparable information about the number of marriage and divorce in eight countries in the years 1981 and 1994.
As an overall trend, most countries have the same trend, which the figure for marriage in 1981 was higher than in 1994, excepting Denmark. The rate of divorce in five countries diminished over the period
In general, American people tend to marry at the highest number nearly 10,000 people in 1981 and 9,000 people in 1994. The same situation can be seen in other six countries, namely UK, Japan, Finland, Germany, France and Italy. There is the different pattern in Denmark, which the figure for marriage increased from 5,000 people to approximately 6,000 people during thirteen-year period.
It is noticeable from the divorce statistic that the highest rate was in the USA which was over 5 thousand. There was no change in this rate for the given 2 years in Germany. Italy had the lowest divorce rate among the given 8 nations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-12-28 | mytinh | 73 | view |
2022-09-09 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
2022-07-18 | thuyqynh | 73 | view |
2022-01-19 | citra orwela | 78 | view |
2022-01-19 | citra orwela | view |
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data. 84
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantage? 61
- Solving environment problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree? 33
- The graphs below show the annual spending of a particular UK university from 1981 to 2001 33
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92771084337 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45995655815 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1595599466 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0309162309887 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0167353039906 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442774524741 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334706079811 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579727935835 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.