The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparions where relevant
The pie charts compare the percentage of British students at an English university who could use languages other than English in two different years, namely 2000 and 2010. It is evident from the charts that students using Spanish made up the largest proportion in both years, then increased and still dominated the overall in 2010.
In 2000, there was about 30% of students who were able to speak Spanish, which doubled the figure for French and another language except for mentioned ones in the charts . The percentage of people having the ability to use German and two other languages at the university were the same, at around 10% each. On the other hand, about 20% of British students did not know any kind of foreign languages .
In 2010, there was a minimal rise in the percentage of people using Spanish to about 35%. This proportion over tripled the figures for French, German and English only. Meanwhile, students being able to speak another language and two other ones experienced the growth of 5% between the given period, to 20% and 15% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | sana_em | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | hungnguyen2712 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | hengameh.roshan | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Saritha Sreejesh | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-28 | Goldenvikie | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources Do you agree or disagree 92
- These day it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in the city. Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation and suggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 61
- Topic: Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend while others not.What is your opinion on this? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts compare the percentage of British students at an English univer...
^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e figure for French and another language except for mentioned ones in the charts ...
^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... except for mentioned ones in the charts . The percentage of people having the ab...
^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d not know any kind of foreign languages . In 2010, there was a minimal rise i...
^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about 35%. This proportion over tripled the figures for French, German and Engli...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rowth of 5% between the given period, to 20% and 15% respectively.
^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etween the given period, to 20% and 15% respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, then, while, except for, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 937.175257732 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90607734807 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42428416079 2.54303337028 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 127.690721649 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 290.88556701 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.1811444149 44.8134815571 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 76.5299724578 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 16.8248392259 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 4.34317383033 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 2.54639175258 275% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339741874506 0.216113520407 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143146931633 0.0766984524023 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796846262333 0.0603063233224 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238667124221 0.12726935374 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545873165231 0.0580467560999 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 8.37731958763 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 70.7449484536 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 8.71597938144 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 7.59969072165 96% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 41.2886597938 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.