Some people say that because of economic progress, government is ignoring other types of progress for a country. To what extent do you think it is correct?
It is often argued by some that, growing progress of economic level, government is avoiding other kind of development which is essential for countries enhancement. However, in my opinion, I disagree with the statement because, sustainable economic progress would achieved by the progress attributed by other sectors.
Initially, economic sustainability of a government or a country attributed by the various level such as, education, social, cultural and travel and tourism. In other words, escalating national economic by the result of achievement in academic and employment level, exchanging money and most probably by tourists. Irrespective of, such areas countries economic progress would not be succeed even though who concentrate only in the economy. Government could not give a priority to other mentioned areas would lead to inhibition of economic growth to the core. Owing to the fact that, no authority to ignore certain sectors for the predominant development as a whole.
Nevertheless, people who oppose to the government in terms of development such as road and transport services, mitigation of community infra structure and poverty inhibition. In fact, irrespective of such development national economy would not be growing and owing to the fact that, any government could not ignore the progress of mentioned areas. For instance, survey report from national tourism department depicts, the outcome of budget which is more than the allotted amount from the ministry. Moreover, in every national budget each government had including abundant amount for the development of different areas like, public work department and communal progress.
To sum up, focusing on economic thrive would be a predominant aim of every country. Nonetheless, get ride of decline and disuse of other sectors progress would lead to deterioration of national financial status and flourish. So that, in my perspective, none of the government authority would not be deprive of other areas development instead of spending more money only for economic thrive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-25 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | RITUKA PURI | 61 | view |
- The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graphs show the changes in spending habits of people in UK betweeon 1971 ans 2001 Write a report to a university lecture and descr8be the data 81
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples 73
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place in west Park secondary school since it s construction in 1950 44
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'achieve'
Suggestion: achieve
...se, sustainable economic progress would achieved by the progress attributed by other sec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...authority would not be deprive of other areas development instead of spending more mo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, for instance, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56549520767 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02070552733 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514376996805 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4236481901 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259193970659 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973779641832 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502169116063 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181696999266 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558036815542 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.