Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government，while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The government is probably the largest employer of a country, hiring hundreds of thousands of people. The debate about whether young people should be appointed to critical government positions never seems to end.
On the one hand, the fact that younger employees account for a rather small proportion in influential positions of the government may be due to their lack of required qualities to be a director or even the prime minister. For example, to run the Department of Finance safely and successfully, the minister is expected to be able to have the knowledge and experience of predicating and battling financial crisis. It is obvious that a candidate in his or her twenties can by no means have equipped themselves with such competences. This is the reason why few people under 40 are elected to be leaders of critical sectors.
On the other hand, there are obvious advantages to having younger employees serving at important government positions. Firstly, they bring creativity and innovation to their work. Active in exposing themselves to a wider range of sources of information, younger superiors are able to come up with more and better solutions to such problems as improving the degree of public satisfaction or bridging the gap of communication between governments and people they serve. Secondly, putting young people at top positions of the government may help to achieve higher goals. This is because they are not as conservative as their older colleagues and sometimes bold leaders lead to greater success.
In my opinion, age should not be a determining factor in the employment of top government staff. However, I suggest that there should be a minimum age requirement in this regard because individuals seriously lacking wisdom of life and work can hardly make sufficient contributions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-31 | xinyu961121 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | 柏宜 | 78 | view |
- Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- 1111 11
- Some people believe famous people’s support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems, while others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 100
- People change their career and place of residence several times during life Is it a positive or negative development 82
- Some people say that when dividing how taxes should be spent, the government should prioritize health care. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22184300341 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97625011408 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8748838134 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184835190586 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640530578361 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664014079841 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109655625777 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563117414675 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.