Should the government provide people with free accommodation?
The issue of accommodation is so acute, nowadays, that a growing number of people are struggling to rent and save money for housing. This leads one to wonder whether governments should supply unites of society with dwelling. This essay agrees with this point of view for the following reasons.
The first reason is that this initiative may trigger an outburst in population growth. It is scientifically proven that the size of population is directly dependent on the availability of housing, so by securing young families with free living spaces, the country may face an uncontrolled increase in the population. This would lead to a shortage of resources and inevitable collapse in the economy. For example, in the former USSR, the government carelessly launched a housing program, namely “Available apartments”, which ultimately created a problem with excessive fertility.
Another reason why governments should not provide people with free places to live in is that people may lose motivation to work. While living in a rented house, many working people attempt to save up for buying a house in the future, but housing supple by the government may gradually exempt them from the need of going to work. This exemption would ultimately create an adverse impact on the economic development, resulting in an economic collapse and people having to go to work again.
However, some sociologists think that securing people with free shelters is necessary. They say that it would help many families, which possess no permanent places of residence, to settle down in one place rather than to constantly relocate. Despite this, providing housing is an unreasonable campaign for the government, since it would cause an acute shortage of building materials, leading to long-term delays in construction.
In conclusion, the idea of providing people free housing is irrational as it would eventually lead to unbearable growth in population and serious economical downturns. Before buying an apartment, people should work hard and plan their family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-20 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | vu_hieu2k5 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-12 | Surbhithegirl | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | roopdeep | 61 | view |
- Some believe that it is good for a country's culture to import films and TV programmes, while others think that it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes. Should these new homes be built in existing cities or should new towns be built in the countryside? 89
- Nowadays for many people the Internet is replacing regular books. What extent do you agree? 61
- These days many people leave their country to work abroad and take their family with them. Do you think benefits of this outweigh disadvantages in terms of family development? 78
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le campaign for the government, since it would cause an acute shortage of buildin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3746130031 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98544812981 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572755417957 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4466274613 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337348107542 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113985144209 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1185165491 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186672851904 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645792158677 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.