Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Numerous individuals tend to think that all university students are supposed to study something that they are fascinated to learn, nevertheless, others think that they are supposed to take a study which is going to be fruitful for later life, such as the studies related to science and technology. In accordance with this argument, this essay will explain both points of view and also put forward my perspective in the following paragraphs.
In regard to the statement above, some people urge that all people have to take a study on higher education which will render benefits to our future life. They thought that there are various functions of this effort. It, firstly, will render an improved enhancement to our technology and knowledge in the future. Secondly, the world is not going to obtain fewer benefits since all people focused on improving a better knowledge and technology.
In accordance with my perspective, I do appreciate of the first statement, nonetheless, I firmly agree to the argument which believe that studying something which individuals liked, furthermore, is going to confer countless more positive impacts. According to the impacts, It, first and foremost, is capable of bestowing freedom to people to select something that they like. Regarding this statement, I do believe that by giving more opportunities to do what we preferred will make more positive outcomes instead of negative results. Second but not less crucial, it, additionally, is able to make people to feel more enjoying their time while they learned since they studied their preferred studies.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that both points of view have their own positive influence for us and the earth. However, I tend to think that giving freedom to people of choosing study that they are interested to learn is going to provide us more upsides rather than downsides.
- Recycling rate for selected materials :1982 - 2010 84
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 61
- the pie charts and table give information about the total value of fish imported to the us between 1988 and 2000. 78
- MIX : The Pie chart and bar chart shows some data which concerned on arrest number 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12703583062 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77765948341 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530944625407 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6301973717 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301206868385 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100519546327 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085183943473 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183021801618 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875387226133 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.