Maps show the changes of the lakeside (2000 – 2009).
The maps illustrate the alterations in the lakeside from 2000 to 2009. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the size of woodland in between 2000 and 2009.
To begin with the north of the river, the existence of old town, derelict warehouses, arts’ centre, residential area which was in the south of arts’ centre and school had been replaced by new offices, new car park, multi-screen cinema, shopping centre and new schools respectively between 2000 and 2009. In contrast, the presences of residential area, which located in the west of derelict warehouses in 2000, remained unchanged over the whole period.
In accordance with the other changes, over the following 9 years, the building’s size of industrial complex had been extended, run to the south part of the lakeside and decreased the woodland area and replaced the position of southern residential area in 2000. Moreover, there was a dramatic drop for the volume of the lake water in which it became smaller in 2009.
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 73
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means their believe that these games are contributing to children development.Now discuss other views and opinion. 78
- The map below shows the changes in an American town between 1948 and 2010. 84
- Some of people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 73
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09411764706 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80925312391 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.0977991906 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252228804152 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153085183982 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142048064983 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2053601175 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156868533419 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.