Super screen company
The Super Screen Movie Production Company asserts that, fewer people watched the movies which were made by the company in the last year even if there were positive reviews by the movie reviewers. The company states that, this is because the reviewers are not reaching to the perspective viewers. Further, the company plans to increase their budget next year on advertising in order to reach more public. However, the company makes several assumptions which needs to be addressed before any decision is made.
Firstly, the company does not mention about the casts which were the part of the films which were produced by the company las year. There is a possibility that, the cast which were the part of the movies are not widely known by the people or have not worked in many movies before. As most of the people watch the movies in order to watch their favorite actors or actresses, if the movies which were produced by the Super Screen Movie Production Company last year did not have any famous actors or actressess it might be that even if the story of the movie is excellent many people didn't watch the movie. Even if there were positive reviews from the reviewers many people didn't watch the movie.
Secondly, the company does not mention about the ticket prices for the movie. It might be that, in the last year due to some changes in the taxes which needs to be added to the base ticket price, the ticket prices have risen by great extent and this is the reason that many people are not watching movies made by the company. So it is a possibility that the public is aware of the movie but because of high ticket prices people are reluctant to spend the money to watch the movie.
Furthermore, the company does not assume about the chances of piracy which may be happening around. Nowadays, there are many cases of movie piracy. So it could be that, there is illegal piracy which is going on and people can watch the movies just by downloading from the internet. So it might be a case that the people are not attending the movies in the theatre's as the movies are leaked on the internet and they can watch it easily.
To sum up, before company takes decision to allocate greater share of its budget on marketing the company must assess this situation well and consider all the points before coming to any decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Mahima1902 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | Eurus Psycho Version | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | riyarmy | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | Saket Choudhary | 68 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 58 | view |
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 63
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 86
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 63
- On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 79
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mammalknown as Repenornamus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal'sstomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers havetherefore suggested th 73
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
---------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 417 350
No. of Characters: 1872 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.519 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.489 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.138 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.062 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.217 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.407 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.62 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.149 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...y of the movie is excellent many people didnt watch the movie. Even if there were pos...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lent many people didnt watch the movie. Even if there were positive reviews from the re...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... reviews from the reviewers many people didnt watch the movie. Secondly, the compa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 415.0 441.139720559 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61927710843 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19146525397 2.78398813304 79% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395180722892 0.468620217663 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1318665017 57.8364921388 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8125 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9375 23.324526521 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 5.70786347227 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202455449744 0.218282227539 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763288014318 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819553227446 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130629338412 0.128457276422 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101788887528 0.0628817314937 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.5979740519 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.