Summary
In this set of materials, the reading states that there are doubts about whether bees exist on Earth since 200 million years ago and provides some reasons. However, the professor thinks that the proposed ideas of the reading are not convincing and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the essay claims that the fossils of actual bees have never been explored that date to 200 million years ago. On the contrary, the professor says that although it is true that we have not yet had 200-million-year-old fossils of bees, it might be possible that their fossils were preserved by some substances called resin. Meanwhile, since the trees that produce resin were not common 200 million years ago, we cannot conclude that the bees did not exist in that time.
Second, the reading asserts that since the flowering plants are the main source of food for the bees and, also, were just appeared on Earth 125 million years ago, it is not reasonable to think that the bees existed 200 million years ago. To argue with this statement, the professor explains that according to historical evolvement, it is possible that the bees first feed on some other substances and, then, evolve and adapt to utilize flower plants ever since.
Third, the reading declares that the founded structures have lack of usual characteristics of modern bees. The professor casts doubts on this point by saying that the chemical features of these structures tell us that they had some shared quality such as being waterproof with modern bees.
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- Do you agree or disagree?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 66
- Summary 3
- Summary 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, then, third, while, such as, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9609375 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51614658801 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53515625 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0086411456 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.111111111 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.0289183223 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.