Advertising encourages customers to buy in quantity not in quality. Do u agree or disagree?
Living in the information age, people are bombarded with substantial daily doses of advertising via multiple media. The argument that advertising, with its overwhelming power, leads to consumer’s impulsive purchase has been accepted by more and more people. Consumers are encouraged by advertisements to purchase products in quantity without paying quality. From my opinion, I do not completely agree with this.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why the advertising has an impact on sales of products. Firstly, those well-designed advertisements are more likely to attract people’s attention so as to encourage them to purchase products. For example, some long-established chicken and hamburger brands such as KFC and Mc Donald are pretty good in creating persuasive advertisements, such as combo for two or three people will have a free ticket for beverages to persuade people to purchase a large number of products.
Moreover, due to people’s interests and preferences, in most cases, usually buy products based on their own emotions and public’s latest trendy. Take some well-known fashion brands such as H&M, Guici, Levis and so forth as an example, no matter the quality is good or bad, people choose products from those brands due to its trademark and prevalent advertisements around the world. Therefore, it can be sure that to some considerable extent, advertising, from time to time, entices costumers to buy products in quantity.
On the other hand, however, advertising still brings people a huge amount of information of products. In other words, people are easily catch the quality of them before buying something. For instance, in terms of food industry, through advertisements, people are able to compare between a variety of products and distinguish some inferior products from quality ones. In fact, a large number of fake goods and products being sold on a large scale in the daily life, especially milk, meat, and some types of nutriments are not realized by customers. however, by getting access to advertisements, they are allowed to buy quality products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | niravparmar | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Niusha | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Harf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Sogol | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Gurvi singh | 56 | view |
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address. We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level. Do u agree or disagree? 73
- Advertising encourages customers to buy in quantity not in quality. Do u agree or disagree? 84
- Some people say that teaching local history to school children is more important than teaching world history to them. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...kely to attract people's attention so as to encourage them to purchase products. Fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 493, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...everages to persuade people to purchase a large number of products. Moreover, due to people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 377, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...or products from quality ones. In fact, a large number of fake goods and products being sold on a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 549, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...triments are not realized by customers. however, by getting access to advertisements, t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, in most cases, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45921450151 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14980147782 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570996978852 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3043356497 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.466666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146772731778 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600431107528 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707363515168 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910864595035 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591572609236 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.