It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
Learn to distinguish the good or bad while they are children is an important factor. Some people believe children should be punished to learn the techniques to separate them. In my opinion, I strongly disagree because punishing is not only a way of learning, creating a good environment can make them able to achieve it quicker. Despite supporting them, we can treat them differently by making to do the same work repeatedly.
Threatening let them do things but it won't help them to learn. Wherever the young children have a starter state of a mind, within those phases teaching with an interesting way can help them to learn. In spite of giving physical and mental torture creating a practical sample about right and wrong helps them to separate the differences. The researcher had found that example-based learning approach is the best solution than giving physical punishment, taking action over them discourages them to do activity effectively, which won't be a good learning style.
Also, physical punishment affects their mental status but logical way treating makes them fast learning. In addition, if they are not obliged towards the subject matter than repetitive action makes them learn quickly. For instance, if they are not respecting elders then making them in front of the junior who won't respect them, such action feels them guilt. It can create a twist in their mind and learn to give respect and take respect. Thus, such actions can play an effective role.
In conclusion, I believe punishing the child won't be the solution to separate right and wrong, but doing an action in a repeated manner increases the logical power to deal with the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | eslamyousry | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | shihan99 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | kingdangyeu0606 | 22 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Mimibae 985 | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 78
- The graphs below show the enrollments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period. 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 73
- The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a repeated manner" with adverb for "repeated"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...te right and wrong, but doing an action in a repeated manner increases the logical power to deal wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02158273381 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63612869059 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579136690647 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8301315874 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264296966502 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105238741571 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480131578593 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173381887491 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534431974755 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.