Some universities now offer their courses on the internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true that online courses are becoming far more normal for people when they decide to study at university. Personally, I believe that this trend has both benefit and drawback effects. This essay will discuss both of them.
There are several reasons why people contend that study online is now inappropriate in university education. The main drawback is that students are failed to have the opportunity to face-to-face with their teachers and have to rely on video lectures instead. Therefore, any misunderstand about the subject is very hard to be cleared up. Moreover, students who study online do not come into direct contact with each other frequently, this could lead to a negative impact on the ability to discuss, criticize, and exchange of ideas. These students are also likely to lack the motivation and factor of competition between each individual that face-to-face groups or traditional courses can provide.
Although there are some drawbacks of this trend, I would argue that it has numerous benefits. Firstly, they allow learners to study in a flexible way, which means that they can learn whenever and wherever that convenient and they can choose the materials that suite their level. Secondly, the cost of university education might be greatly reduced thanks to online courses and the revenues for institutions also increase as more students sign up to these courses. Finally, online learning offers an open access to anybody who is willing to study regardless of age, location, capacity and background. My uncle, for example, who is 50 years old, has recently enrolled on an online English course and learned a great deal of knowledge from this site.
In conclusion, while I admit that there are obvious some disadvantages of online learning, but it cannot deny that more and more people are able to study from all over the world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-04 | Bilal-88 | 89 | view |
2019-07-30 | baotruong | 84 | view |
2018-11-04 | Leo1992 | 56 | view |
2018-09-27 | negardavoodi | 73 | view |
2018-07-18 | sweet angel | 78 | view |
- Some people think that government should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that these people should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give more prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 78
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe that this would benefit both the individual and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some universities now offer their courses on the internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a flexible way" with adverb for "flexible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... Firstly, they allow learners to study in a flexible way, which means that they can learn whenev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'open access'.
Suggestion: open access
...ourses. Finally, online learning offers an open access to anybody who is willing to study rega...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08852459016 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65985109496 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.599301475 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238186424705 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736242196558 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407741473832 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131627556877 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277312366638 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.