People usually mix their private and professional life.What are the pros and cons
Some people state that Employees should keep their private lives and personal activities as separate as possible from a workplace.Others say that private and professional lives must go hand in hand to foster the growth of an individual as well as the company. The issue is a controversial one as both the methods has its own pro and cons. To maintain productivity at work, I would say that private lives can be mingled with professional lives up to a limit that will not harm the productivity at work.
Firstly, the employees that work in a company will have better relations if they share their personal lives with each other. It fosters a positive feeling and understanding amongst colleagues at work. This will help to work in groups and thus the work can be solved in a quicker and effective way. But, if there is too much interaction regarding private lives in the office, it would lead to no work and only gossips that would hamper the work as the employees will be busy discussing their private lives and personal activities at a workplace. Thus the efficiency of employees will decrease. Private and professional life, a mixture of both lives must be balanced.
Secondly, If a person keeps himself aloof from colleagues he may not find his workplace a better place to work. This may have a negative effect on him and thus his productivity may decrease. He/She may have some personal problems due to which he lacks concentration in his work. But as he has no one discusses, he keeps to himself the problem that may hamper his work. In this case, he cannot share his workload amongst other people. This, in turn, may have a negative effect on his performance. However, if the colleagues have better relationships with people around he can discuss the problems. They can get better help and suggestions which may be helpful to him without affecting his work.
To conclude, Private and Professional life must be in proportion at the workplace so that people do work and in addition, have fun. This will have a positive effect on employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-02 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2020-11-29 | Basil3241 | 81 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | navneet sidhu | 72 | view |
| 2020-05-17 | mndpsngh21 | 75 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages Which type of communication do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples 60
- The lecture discusses the painter Jackson Pollock. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they illustrate specific points made in the reading passage. 60
- The only thing that interferes with my learning is toy education- Einstein. What does he mean by that? And do you think he is correct? 72
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 60
- People think that success comes through hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Others
...s separate as possible from a workplace.Others say that private and professional lives...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nd personal activities at a workplace. Thus the efficiency of employees will decrea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 6.10837438424 409% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 20.9802955665 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 354.0 242.827586207 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78248587571 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80513026175 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443502824859 0.580463131201 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3799119347 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1052631579 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115052669301 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409044785715 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651882926805 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100093302912 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554294684098 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.5310837438 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.32886699507 88% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 59.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.