The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
The bar graph depicts different motifs of travelling through public transport and the pie chart illustrates various problems come across by americans in the year 2009.
Overall, It is witnessed that the highest number of people in US commuted for work purpose and the main concern of all the travelers regardless of their intentions was cost during the given period of time.
Analyzing each purpose behind travelling by public transport, it is observed that the highest percentage of people travel to and from work that was 49% . The percentage of people in US who opted to travel due to their personal reasons and shopping were 19% and 16% respectively. However, one-tenth percentage of people in US chose to hop on public transport for recreation and 6% prefer public transport for visiting relatives.
Moving towards the concerns regarding traveling through public transport , It is clearly seen majority of people faced the issue related to price (36%).Another main problems associated with people regard to traveling were safety concern,aggressive drivers and highway congestion. Their percentage were 19% ,17% and 14% respectively.Finally, below 10% of people had problems related to space congestion and accessibility.
- bar graph 11
- Many people believe that social networkingsites (such as Facebook) have had a hugenegative impact on both individuals andsocietyTo what extent do you agree? 56
- bar graph 11
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?Give reasons for your 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ir intentions was cost during the given period of time. Analyzing each purpose behind tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ple travel to and from work that was 49% . The percentage of people in US who opte...
^^
Line 13, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rding traveling through public transport , It is clearly seen majority of people f...
^^
Line 13, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...le faced the issue related to price 36%.Another main problems associated with people re...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , aggressive
... regard to traveling were safety concern,aggressive drivers and highway congestion. Their p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 304, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ay congestion. Their percentage were 19% ,17% and 14% respectively.Finally, below ...
^^
Line 13, column 331, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...tage were 19% ,17% and 14% respectively.Finally, below 10% of people had problems relat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51052631579 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13764369276 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3878885167 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.571428571 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349690944401 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153821705685 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542391642016 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195981854001 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544686928567 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.