Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In 21st century this issue about recycling and pollution have an important impact to the whole planet. Unfortunately most of the people do not put so much interest into this problem who actually can end our life on Earth. In this essay I will discuss about my conception about this critical issue and I will give example about this topic.
Firstly, it is everyone responsability to implement this change. In my opinion we should not wait for the parliament to make a legal requirements, we have to change something in our behavior and comply to help the enivronement. In order to understand why this should be done we need to understand the consequences. Having said that even they know what will happen by not complying, some people act like it is normal to throw garbage on the ground or in the ocean. To put in another way, i think law are needed to do something to make people recycle more of their waste, because what scares people more than an expensive fine example: when bins are collected they should be refused when they are not separating their waste . For instance France already implemented the law, not to mention that they have recycle bin everywhere on the street, and surerly in their houses.
Secondly, this controversial issue doesn't affect only the humans, but affect the whole wildlife, that's why are so many species disappear. despite of this people are still careless. However, now it is not about race, religion, nationality, politics, now it's about our home, Earth. To give you an illustration, the north pole is melting, the ocean are full of plastic, and we are more concerned to start a war than to save our life here. That is to say we need to be scared and if all the earthquakes, the rains,the floods, the climate change can not scare us, i think the law will.
Over all, we need to understand that our life it is in danger, and it is our fault, unfortunately technology can not save us now.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | Hanachan123456789 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | Shraddanand | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | saipriyanka | 73 | view |
- A person’s health is their own responsibility rather than the government’s responsibility.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- A successful person is one who earns a lot of money. To what extend do you agree or dissagree? 73
- Some people think that mobile phones are most useful for their professional life other thinks that mobile phones are most useful in their personal life. Discuss of them and give your opinion. 56
- In recent years, Many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or a negative development? 56
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...an end our life on Earth. In this essay i will discuss about my conception about ...
^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...onception about this critical issue and i will give example about this topic. ...
^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'come'?
Suggestion: come
...ic. Firstly, the change should be come with us, its not a solution to wait unt...
^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...tly, the change should be come with us, its not a solution to wait until the parlia...
^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...or in the ocean. To put in another way, i think law are needed to do something to...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... street, and surely in their houses. Secondly, this controversial issue doesn...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... Secondly, this controversial issue doesnt affect only the humans, but affect the ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... humans, but affect the whole wildlife, thats why are so many species disappear. desp...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Despite
...hats why are so many species disappear. despite of this people are still careless. Howe...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 150, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e so many species disappear. despite of this people are still careless. However, now...
^^^^
Line 9, column 510, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ed and if all the earthquakes, the rains,the floods, the climate change can not scar...
^^^^
Line 9, column 560, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s, the climate change can not scare us, i think the law will. To sum up, we...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i think, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55974842767 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52129100862 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0252007447 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195501929465 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717691014518 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912992169757 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106805015573 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933608454075 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.