Science and technology will someday be able to solve all of society’s problems.
It is clear from a brief glance at history that technology has the ability to make life objectively better for us all. Interlinked and inseparable, the discoveries and innovations of science and technology respectfully has led us from magnificent things from the wheel to all the way to the international space station & promises of a ‘new world’. Moreover, in everyday life here on earth, the benefits of technology brings objectively greater quality of life meaning there is less need for crime. From economic growth comes stability and the advancement of both science and technology has allowed us to accelerate our connection to one another through the innovations of transport and the internet. However to state that Technology will solve ‘all of society’s problems’ is a naive statement not considering of secondary and tertiary effect and the inherent set of new problems that come with each new solution. We must give room to science and technology but we must be quixodian in considering it to the absolute in solving all of our problems.
The promises of science and technology in solving problems are a real driver in giving purpose to life, figuring out meaning, understanding the simulation that we are in and making ‘positive’ impact - the problems of this general statement to be discussed later. Through these practices, we can build hospitals for the sick and find greater ways to take care of them. We can build machines to explore to the deepest depths of our universe
However, technology is not the absolute answer. Many of societies problems are inherently human to where technology is an amplifier for human behaviour. In technology good behaviour becomes great and bad becomes atrocious. The aeroplane has allowed us to become closer to each-other economically, culturally and socially but was the proponent of 9/11, one of the most horrific terrorist attacks the world has ever seen. Technology is not the absolute.
Even if Science and Technology are able to solve all of the problems society has today, solving these problem inevitably unlocks doors to more consequential problems. Thus one could say it’s a carrot and stick. The aeroplane has brought revolution in the way we were are able to interact with the world and each other, but could the same positive connotation be placed on the deaths and tragedies of air travel? Or the battles fought within the seat of the cockpit, like WW2? It is clear the upsides of tech generally outweigh the downsides but even clearer is the multitude of new problems each new innovation brings.
Therefore, in conclusion; The discoveries of science and the subsequent innovations of technology are absolute marvels - where purpose forms from our ability to create wonderful, new and novel things. However, we can not be naive. Despite technology bringing promise, hope and objectively better lives for all of us, with every new solution brings a multitude of new problems, particularly around human behaviour where technology is an amplifier of the way we are as people. Good becomes great and bad becomes atrocious. Therefore, with an optimistic attitude mixed with a slight skepticism, we can give faith to the abilities of science and technology but not absolutely as the saviour of society.
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from those who they lead. 50
- shrimp 41
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 69
- Discussion is useless in changing someone’s core beliefs 58
- Science and technology will someday be able to solve all of society’s problems. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ternational space station & promises of a 'new world'. Moreover, in eve...
^
Line 1, column 711, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ovations of transport and the internet. However to state that Technology will solve &ap...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re to the deepest depths of our universe However, technology is not the absolute ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 50, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...cience and Technology are able to solve all of the problems society has today, solving the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'problems'' or 'problem's'?
Suggestion: problems'; problem's
...Technology are able to solve all of the problems society has today, solving these proble...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 97, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...the problems society has today, solving these problem inevitably unlocks doors to more conseq...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s doors to more consequential problems. Thus one could say it's a carrot and st...
^^^^
Line 19, column 602, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...r is the multitude of new problems each new innovation brings. Therefore, in conclusio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 679, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and technology but not absolutely as the saviour of society.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2800.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25328330206 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03239946381 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476547842402 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 893.7 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.393555014 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.739130435 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1739130435 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.34782608696 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345636479968 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945957154065 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900240467267 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191095839014 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851371717498 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.