The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from those who they lead.
Although it can be said that leaders, by encouraging feedback from those they lead, is a progressive stance and a characteristic of critical thinking present in many of the best leaders: The best leaders result from a range of characteristics and contextual factors beyond simply their open push for peer feedback.
First and foremost, it is foundational that we understand that encouraging feedback as a progressive method of leadership is only applicable in certain cases, thus, leaders must be evaluated within the context of their leadership. For example, this can be explained in the comparison of 21st-century hi-tech business leadership compared to military leadership. In 21st-century business, let's say in High-Technology, critical thinking is a soft skill that is highly valued and thus companies, seeking this skill, generally hire people who can think extremely critically. This characteristic then closes the divide between the leader and the lead and provides a 'system' of working that is highly intellectual and conceptual.
Onwards, perhaps we can evaluate the statement as directionally correct but not fully developed. The best leaders might not be those who encourage feedback from the people they lead but understand that this feedback is a tool to be used in particular scenarios - such as in politics.
In all, leaders encouragement of feedback from those they lead is a particularly progressive stance and has been fruitful particularly in the modern world of business, where high level, critical thinkers are in collaboration to solve complex problems. However, we can see that this openness to feedback is less effective in other forms of leadership, such as the military, where the decisions of the leader. Therefore we can say that the best leaders result from a range of characteristics and contextual factors beyond simply their open push for peer feedback.
- shrimp 41
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 69
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 66
- Science and technology will someday be able to solve all of society’s problems. 70
- Discussion is useless in changing someone’s core beliefs 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('particularly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('progressive') instead of another adjective.
...ent of feedback from those they lead is a particularly progressive stance and has been fruitful particular...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ary, where the decisions of the leader. Therefore we can say that the best leaders result...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39864864865 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19545826617 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503378378378 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3482681092 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.8 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375268603816 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147986919217 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151482731798 0.0758088955206 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272141985896 0.150359130593 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110730606492 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.