Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model. Do you support it or not?
The importance of successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational, This essay will further elaborate my views for favouring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that sports stars always given physically fitness and many other kind of activity. For example, Milkha Singh alway speak related to body fitness. Needless to say all these merits in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effect is that films stars many kind of youngsters role of model. For example, sidhu mosse wala self made star and promote drugs. Hence it is apparent why many are favour of this trend.
In conclusion according to argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefit of successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model are indeed too dire to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | sowmiyapurple | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | madhutalaari@gmail.com | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Shruti gupta radhika | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-22 | neethujithin | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
... the crucial effect is that films stars many kind of youngsters role of model. For exampl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... wala self made star and promote drugs. Hence it is apparent why many are favour of t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10407239819 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60795261506 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58371040724 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4258475277 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330251671672 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124182359765 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156966712089 0.071462118173 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22683335668 0.151781067708 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120964377167 0.0609392437508 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.