TPO 33
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
There is no shortage of opinion on whether students take advantage on group project. In my opinion, working with other students can be big hindrance for students. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, students in the group works unequally because of other peers who have no commitment and not ambitious about the assignment. Moreover, some graduates end up finishing the homework alone although they have group mates who must help them. Therefore, some people of the team do not learn anything while others master it. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. When I started studying in university, my mathematics instructor assigned graduates group project, and I was sharing similar group with four pupils whom I have never seen before. When I started researching about the topic, none of my associates helped me. Afterwards I ended up accomplishing everything alone, which means others get a fine grade on a topic without learning anything. If we had worked one by one, they would have learn and handle the topic for the grade. Drawing from my own experience, some people lose their commitment while working as project because they believe others rather than themselves.
Secondly, if pupils are required to study as team, magnitude of time will be consumed for group meeting, which may be hindrance. Waiting for other members and talking about decision expends large amount of time, especially if some of the the team are not punctual. For instance, the last session, I prepared presentation with few students one of whom is bad at timekeeping. When we arranged meeting in order to decide what topic we choose, we ruined almost three hours by waiting the member who is not punctual. Moreover, we deferred our research and lost our opportunity to develop our topic because of him. Unfortunately, this is common event among graduates especially juniors including me, which confine them to consume their time and learn efficiently. In conclusion, group projects tend to ruin big amount of time for unnecessary things such as waiting,
To sum up, many people fails to take advantage on the team assignment. This is because some students do not involve in the discussion and studying or cause problems by letting others wait.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 78
- Reading books is important for children to gain knowledge about the world However some parents force their children to read non fiction books as they believe fiction is not good for children Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to su 91
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 865, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
... had worked one by one, they would have learn and handle the topic for the grade. Dra...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nds large amount of time, especially if some of the the team are not punctual. For instance...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e amount of time, especially if some of the the team are not punctual. For instance, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e amount of time, especially if some of the the team are not punctual. For instance, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 860, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for unnecessary things such as waiting, To sum up, many people fails to take adv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, talking about, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05102040816 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72171761433 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56887755102 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7129601353 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188241099904 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582901404351 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042795087208 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11126069748 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519475316589 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.