People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
These days the prevalence of sugar refreshments has intensified, which, to some extent, poses a great threat to consumers' both mental and physical health. I will give some causes and feasible solutions to this in the essay below.
To begin with, there are some underlying explanations why sugar drink is consumed in great quantities. First, since the chemical effects of sugar help consumers to relax and be stressed-out, many people find it really difficult to get rid of such drinks. Obviously, in this day and age, the pace of their working life can easily eclipse the bad impact of these drinks on their health, which may manipulate people into comsuming lots of refreshments containing a great deal of sugar and other chemicals. Second, in order to satisfy consumers and guarantee substantial profits, numerous manufacturers seem to use an amount of caffein and other stimulants, which undeniably induces people to consume. For instance, international businesses like Coca Cola or Pepsi are selling hundreds of millions soda cans every year, and numerous bodies of research have pointed out that these drinks, made from a large amount of dangerous chemicals if consumed in great quantities, may cause people to become addicted to such drink.
In reality, governments certainly play key roles in cutting down on sugar drink. First, if governments are to impose heavy taxes on the import and the manufacture of those refreshments, the supply for those drink would drop or price will increase as a result of higher tax, and consumers might want to find other substitute drinks. This means that people will consume less sugar-based beverages when they become a luxury. Second, it is imperative for governments to use advertisement on TVs as a manipulating tool to make consumers get rid of sugar-based sodas. For example, when consumers are aware of adverse impact of those drinks, it is likely that they will avoid drinking those unhealthy sodas.
In conclusion, people nowadays are likely to be addicted to sugar due largely to its chemical taste, which certainly gives rise to the consumption of sodas containing a great amount of such chemical. Only when governments are to take some mentioned measures will people stop drink this unhealthy sorts of beverages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | huy12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | trần thị như minh | 84 | view |
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays most people try to balance between work and other parts of lifes Unfortunately not many achieve this balace What are the problems of this Suggest some solutions to solve the problem Suggest some solutions to solve the problem 84
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 89
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, really, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1875 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82014294432 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557065217391 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8248903051 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.357142857 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256612504964 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965742411486 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045929122578 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145951059999 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631994539576 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.