Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
In the technology era, people could easily access a great deal of information on the internet more effectively. Thus, it is argued that money is being wasted on keeping public libraries working. However, I disagree with this idea because public libraries are not only places where book stored, they are offering what computer lacking: accurate sources of information and economic values.
Firstly, it is crucial to keep in mind that public libraries provide people with a suitable environment for studying and research, where there are absolute silence, peace and scholarly atmosphere. Clearly, computers are unable to offer. For example, according to a study published by Stanford University last year, despite the computer technology of development, U.S and Canadian libraries saw a steady increase in visits over a 10 years period with 75% of the visitors being high school and college students, showing that a large population is still fond of studying in public libraries.
Secondly, public ancient libraries act as tourist attractions, which gives many countries a boost in their economy. Every year, public libraries around the world are reported that be one of the most popular tourist destinations. For instance, the U.K is renowned not only for the Big Ben or the River Thames but also for the Bodleian public library. Featuring distinctive English Gothic architectural characteristics and a history dating back to the 15th century, the Bodleian public library contributes greatly to the UK economy through tourism activities.
In conclusion, despite using computer technology more effective, nevertheless, I believe that public libraries carry significant benefits such as supplying an appropriate study environment and developing the tourism industry, which can not be replaced by the computers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | linh đan | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 86
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010 78
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles 84
- The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015 80
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...e computer technology of development, U.S and Canadian libraries saw a steady inc...
^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...urist destinations. For instance, the U.K is renowned not only for the Big Ben or...
^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lic libraries carry significant benefits such as supplying an appropriate study e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.559566787 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94055232864 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638989169675 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.3679424764 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247601357516 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924115842054 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516573962313 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148389294485 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346651339202 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.